Substitute for Experience,
Knowledge & Advocacy
At Saland Law, led by former prosecutor Jeremy Saland, we guide both respondents and complainants through the complex web of Title IX hearings. Whether you have been accused or are seeking redress, we understand how life‑altering a finding of responsibility can be. Based in New York City with nationwide reach, we stand ready to advocate for your rights at every stage.
Through Jeremy’s prosecutorial background, we bring a unique perspective. Having seen cases from both sides, he knows how schools conduct investigations, and how far their consequences can reach beyond the campus. This page details both direct academic and disciplinary consequences and the often-overlooked ripple effects (financial, reputational, legal, even psychological) that follow a Title IX finding.
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681–1688) prohibits sex‑based discrimination in any education program or activity receiving federal funds. Its scope extends to sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking, coercion, unwanted sexual contact, and non‑consensual sexual behavior. Getting a finding of responsibility means the institution has determined, usually by a preponderance of the evidence, that the respondent violated the school’s gender‐based harassment policy under Title IX.
These findings can come with immediate disciplinary action. Yet beneath the surface, consequences extend much further affecting finances, academics, reputations, careers, and mental health. Both respondents and complainants, depending on the case direction, face wide‑ranging effects long after the hearing ends.
Once a respondent is found responsible, schools impose sanctions based on their internal code. A respondent may be suspended, which means being temporarily removed from classes and campus life for a specified period. In more serious cases, a student may be expelled entirely from the institution, which typically includes a permanent transcript notation. This kind of notation can significantly hinder future academic opportunities, such as college transfers or graduate school admissions.
In other scenarios, a respondent might be placed on probation or face restricted access, limiting their participation in campus activities including internships, athletic programs, and social events. Schools may also mandate participation in educational or remedial programs, such as counseling, sexual misconduct education sessions, or community service. Failure to comply with these programs can result in additional enforcement measures.
Moreover, schools often issue temporary or permanent no-contact orders, which prevent the respondent from contacting the complainant. These orders can disrupt class schedules, group assignments, or housing arrangements. While Title IX regulations state that supportive measures must remain non‑punitive and non‑disciplinary until a finding is made, remedies following a determination of responsibility can be significantly more punitive and life-altering.
A Title IX finding may be recorded on the student’s academic transcript, often labeled as “expulsion” or “withdrawal for disciplinary reasons.” Even when anonymized or vaguely worded, such notations can raise red flags with admissions committees and future employers.
On the other hand, complainants may receive academic accommodations to help them continue their education without disruption. These may include excused absences, access to tutoring, or reassignment of classes to avoid further trauma. These adjustments are intended to preserve their access to education and promote recovery after the incident.
For respondents, a Title IX finding may result in immediate removal or relocation from campus housing. This can lead to financial strain due to new housing expenses and logistical issues associated with moving. In severe cases, students may be barred from campus altogether, cutting them off from critical resources such as libraries, research labs, counseling services, and on-campus medical care.
Complainants may also need changes to their housing in order to feel safe. However, such changes are not always implemented unless the school takes prompt and consistent enforcement steps following a finding.
A Title IX finding can lead to significant financial consequences for the respondent. If suspended or expelled, students often lose eligibility for federally funded grants and loans. Some may be required to repay disbursed funds, and future financial aid eligibility can be revoked altogether.
Adding to the burden, many institutions do not refund tuition after removal from school, meaning the respondent may be financially responsible for a semester or term they were unable to complete.
In cases where a student must restart their education elsewhere, the financial toll compounds. Without access to prior aid packages or scholarships, students may need to pay full tuition out of pocket at a new institution.
The consequences of a Title IX finding are not limited to the academic setting. For students pursuing careers in law, healthcare, education, counseling, or social work, a finding may need to be disclosed to professional licensing boards. In some professions, such as teaching or psychology, this disclosure could result in a denial of licensure.
Additionally, many employers conduct thorough background checks. A Title IX disciplinary record can negatively influence hiring decisions, especially in fields involving children, vulnerable populations, or government roles. Furthermore, damage to one’s professional network is difficult to quantify. The stigma of a finding can isolate a student from alumni communities, industry mentors, and social or academic contacts who would otherwise assist in career development.
A finding of responsibility often brings public stigma. Both respondents and complainants can face judgment from peers, faculty, and even online communities. Respondents may be ostracized or vilified, while complainants may find themselves disbelieved or retraumatized by scrutiny.
The emotional toll can be severe. The process of being investigated, participating in hearings, and awaiting outcomes often leads to anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress. Both parties may require therapy or long-term mental health support to regain their sense of safety, self-worth, or clarity.
Title IX proceedings also impact personal identity. Respondents may feel as though they have been unfairly labeled or defined by the incident, while complainants often struggle with feelings of betrayal, shame, or loss of trust in the institution.
Title IX is administered by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. Institutions must follow specific procedural safeguards:
Failing to follow these procedures can lead to federal investigations, loss of federal funding, or civil lawsuits such as “deliberate indifference” claims. A finding may encourage further action from the complainant or institution.
Jeremy Saland’s experience as a former prosecutor allows him to dissect cases with precision and strategy. He carefully reviews the available evidence and identifies any procedural violations or inconsistencies. In cases involving affirmative consent, he challenges overly broad or misapplied definitions. Affirmative consent requires clear, knowing, and voluntary agreement; silence alone does not constitute consent.
We prepare our clients to present themselves credibly at hearings, explain their conduct in a nuanced way, and withstand cross-examination. If a finding is rendered, we focus on minimizing sanctions and protecting academic records wherever possible.
We also assist individuals seeking justice and protection through the Title IX process. We ensure that supportive measures such as no-contact directives, class schedule changes, and access to counseling are properly implemented. We advocate for a thorough and trauma-informed examination of facts, especially in cases involving unwanted sexual contact, coercion, or dating violence.
Our team helps complainants secure remedies tailored to their needs, whether that includes written apologies, academic accommodations, or safety planning. We also ensure that school personnel take complaints seriously and that procedural rights are honored.
Although based in New York City, Saland Law advises students and faculty across the country. Because Title IX is federal law, the rules apply nationwide. However, every institution has its own code of conduct, interpretations of affirmative consent, and unique adjudication methods. We understand how different schools from the University of California system to private colleges in Texas or New York handle Title IX complaints, and we tailor our strategy accordingly.
Institutional knowledge: Jeremy’s time as a prosecutor equipped him with courtroom-style case analysis and investigation skills that many campus advisors lack.
Balanced advocacy: We represent both sides, complainants and respondents, and deeply understand both perspectives.
Nationwide network: We collaborate with local counsel, forensic experts, therapists, and advocates coast to coast.
Holistic approach: Each case considers not only the hearing result, but academic progression, transcript impact, financial aid, mental health, and future career plans.
Personalized support: We resist cookie‑cutter strategies. Every case is different. We adapt to your needs with empathy, strategy, and respect.
A Title IX finding of responsibility is more than a disciplinary label. It can change a student’s life significantly; academically, financially, professionally, and emotionally. Knowing your rights, the statutes, and the strategies to guard your future is vital. At Saland Law, we treat every case with seriousness and precision.
If you’ve been accused or think your response was mishandled, or if you are a complainant seeking care and justice, reach out. Our New York City based team offers nationwide support. Call us at 212.312.7129 or click here to set up a confidential consultation.