Featured In
CNN
MSNBC
FOX BUSINESS
abc NEWS
NBC NEWS

Tulane University Title IX Lawyer-Advisor

For students at Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana, allegations of sexual misconduct in violation of Title IX will create complications that extend far beyond the classroom and potentially well into a student’s future. A complaint involving sexual assault, unwanted sexual contact, dating violence, stalking or sexual harassment will kick off a process that will require a student to participate in university interviews, respond to evidence presented by other individuals, and even potentially share private and embarassing communications. Depending on the allegations, the complaint alone or the forthcoming investigation may also affect housing arrangements, participation in student organizations and events,relationships with classmates, and future academic opportunities. Even worse, the end result of the Title IX or disciplinary process may be a suspension or expulsion. Whether you are accused of violating university policy or are reporting misconduct, support from an attorney-advisor will help you understand how to navigate Tulane’s procedures to best ensure your time at the school is not upended, your name is not soiled, and your future is protected and safe. 

Saland Law represents and advises both respondents and complainants involved in Title IX investigations and disciplinary proceedings at Tulane University. Led by criminal defense lawyer and former prosecutor Jeremy Saland, our firm helps students evaluate allegations, identify and implement strategies, prepare for investigative interviews, examine evidence, and navigate hearings involving disputed facts or conflicting testimony. Although headquartered in New York City, Saland Law provides Title IX representation to students at colleges and universities throughout the United States, including Tulane’s campuses in New Orleans, Louisiana. We approach each case individually, recognizing that your  educational future and personal circumstances deserve careful consideration throughout the disciplinary process.

How Tulane Handles Sexual Misconduct Complaints

Tulane University maintains a Title IX Office responsible for coordinating the university’s response to allegations of sex discrimination, sexual harassment, dating violence, stalking, sexual exploitation and sexual violence. The university’s official Title IX website explains reporting options, supportive measures, investigative procedures, and resources available to individuals affected by sexual misconduct. Unlike institutions that address all sexual misconduct allegations through one disciplinary framework, Tulane distinguishes among different categories of complaints based on the conduct alleged and the applicable university policies.

The distinction is important because conduct that does not qualify for the federal Title IX grievance process may still violate Tulane’s Code of Student Conduct. Allegations involving students that fall outside the jurisdiction of federal Title IX regulations may be investigated and resolved under the university’s separate disciplinary procedures. Either way, a student can still find him or herself suspended or expelled. Matters involving employees may instead implicate Tulane’s Equal Opportunity and Anti-Discrimination policies. A student or faculty member should therefore understand which procedures govern the allegations before assuming that a particular hearing format, evidentiary rule, or resolution option applies.

Federal Title IX Protections and University Responsibilities

Title IX of the Education Amendments, codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a), prohibits sex discrimination in educational programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. The statute is supported by enforcement provisions under 20 U.S.C. § 1682 and implementing regulations contained in 34 C.F.R. Part 106. Relevant regulations include 34 C.F.R. § 106.30, which defines sexual harassment under the applicable federal framework, and 34 C.F.R. §§ 106.44 and 106.45, which establish institutional response obligations and formal grievance requirements.

Under the applicable federal regulations, sexual harassment includes certain forms of sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking. It may also involve unwelcome conduct that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive to deny a person equal access to educational programs or activities. Qualifying complaints must satisfy additional jurisdictional requirements, including those concerning the university’s educational programs or activities. Saland Law examines these requirements alongside Tulane’s institutional policies to determine which protections and procedures should apply to a client’s circumstances.

Reporting Sexual Misconduct at Tulane: Understanding Your Options

One distinctive aspect of Tulane’s Title IX system is its emphasis on separating disclosures, requests for assistance, and formal complaints. Students may seek support without necessarily initiating a formal disciplinary proceeding. Tulane’s Title IX website describes opportunities to disclose misconduct, obtain supportive services, report potentially criminal behavior, or pursue a formal complaint. Understanding these choices can be particularly important for complainants who are uncertain about participating in an investigation or respondents who have been contacted about an allegation but do not yet understand its procedural status.

When a student discloses possible sexual misconduct to a non-confidential university employee, Tulane may connect the individual with Case Management and Victim Support Services. These resources can help students explore available assistance, including academic accommodations, counseling, and changes affecting university housing. The university also explains options for reporting incidents to law enforcement, including the Tulane University Police Department and the New Orleans Police Department. A disclosure to university officials, a formal Title IX complaint, and a criminal report are distinct actions that may produce different consequences.

Formal Complaints and University Investigations

A formal Title IX complaint may initiate Tulane’s federal grievance procedure when the allegations meet the applicable requirements. The university provides a specific reporting mechanism for individuals seeking to initiate that process. Once a qualifying complaint proceeds, the parties may receive formal notice of the allegations and information about the investigative process. Investigators can collect documents, interview witnesses, review electronic communications, and examine other evidence relevant to determining whether misconduct occurred.

Students sometimes underestimate the importance of their initial statements or take a cavalier approach to answering questions or providing a narrative. A respondent may provide an incomplete account because certain details seem unimportant or there is a wrongful belief that if he or she keeps quiet then the investigator will never find out the answer. On the other side, a complainant may struggle to organize events that occurred during an emotionally difficult encounter or fail to provide important details. Later discrepancies can affect how investigators evaluate testimony, even when an inconsistency does not necessarily establish dishonesty. Jeremy Saland helps clients prepare for interviews, understand the allegations, and present accurate information without speculation or unsupported conclusions.

Title IX Investigations Involving Tulane’s Residential Communities

Tulane’s Uptown campus brings students together through residence halls, shared dining facilities, academic buildings, and campus organizations. Residential communities such as Monroe Residence Hall, Sharp Hall, Greenbaum Residence Hall, and Weatherhead Hall provide opportunities for students to develop close relationships while living near classmates and friends. Those same connections can make a sexual misconduct investigation especially complicated when the complainant and respondent live nearby or regularly interact with the same people.

For example, a complaint involving students who attended a gathering in a residence hall may require investigators to interview roommates, identify who entered or left a room, and examine messages exchanged before or after the alleged incident. The parties may disagree about whether sexual contact was consensual, whether alcohol affected a person’s decision-making capacity, or what witnesses observed. Meanwhile, both individuals may continue to use the same dining facilities or encounter mutual friends around campus. These practical circumstances can create legitimate concerns about privacy, communication restrictions, and continued access to university activities.

Housing Changes and Academic Accommodations

Tulane’s published reporting guidance identifies several supportive measures that may be available to students involved in sexual misconduct matters. These include changes to residence hall assignments, adjustments to class schedules, assistance with assignments or examinations, and restrictions on contact between individuals. Depending on the situation, the university may also consider modifications to access certain facilities or activities.

A student living in Monroe Residence Hall may have different concerns from a graduate student attending classes at the A. B. Freeman School of Business or the Tulane University School of Law. Students using the Howard-Tilton Memorial Library, attending programs in the Lavin-Bernick Center for University Life, or participating in campus organizations may need to understand how university directives affect their regular activities. Saland Law assists complainants and respondents in evaluating supportive measures while considering their educational responsibilities and the university’s safety obligations.

Sexual Assault Allegations Arising From Tulane’s Social Environment

Tulane’s location in New Orleans creates a distinctive student experience. The university’s Uptown campus sits near neighborhoods known for restaurants, music venues, social gatherings, and nightlife. Students may attend events around St. Charles Avenue, Freret Street, or elsewhere in the city before returning to campus residences. When a sexual misconduct allegation involves an off-campus encounter, questions about university jurisdiction, applicable policies, and potential criminal investigations can become particularly important.

An incident occurring away from university property does not automatically fall outside Tulane’s disciplinary authority. The federal Title IX grievance process has specific jurisdictional limitations, but Tulane may separately address certain misconduct under its Code of Student Conduct. Determining which rules apply requires consideration of the location, the university’s relationship to the event, and the alleged conduct. These distinctions may affect investigative procedures and available resolution options, making a careful review of the governing policies essential.

Many university sexual assault allegations center on whether the individuals involved voluntarily agreed to sexual activity. The concept of affirmative consent generally refers to a knowing, mutual, and voluntary agreement to participate in sexual contact. However, Tulane’s applicable definitions must control the analysis of an individual complaint. Consent to one form of sexual activity does not necessarily establish consent to another, and a previous romantic relationship does not automatically authorize subsequent encounters.

Alcohol consumption can make these cases more complicated. Investigators may need to determine whether a person was incapacitated, whether another individual knew or reasonably should have known of that condition under the applicable standard, and what surrounding evidence reveals about the encounter. Drinking alcohol does not necessarily mean that someone lacked the ability to consent, but significant impairment may raise serious questions concerning capacity and voluntary participation. Our firm works with clients to evaluate messages, witness observations, timelines, and other relevant information while recognizing that neither an allegation nor a denial alone resolves the factual dispute.

Fraternity and Sorority Allegations at Tulane University

Fraternity and sorority organizations play an important role in Tulane’s student community. Organizations associated with Tulane’s Greek life programs have included fraternities such as Sigma Chi, Kappa Sigma, Phi Delta Theta, Zeta Beta Tau, and Sigma Alpha Epsilon, along with sororities such as Kappa Kappa Gamma, Phi Mu, Pi Beta Phi, and Sigma Delta Tau. These organizations offer leadership opportunities, community service, and social activities, but complaints arising in connection with fraternity or sorority events can involve both individual and organizational concerns.

Tulane’s fraternity and sorority system has distinctive recruitment and membership requirements, including a deferred recruitment process for entering students. The university also establishes rules governing participation in certain fraternity social events. When an alleged sexual assault occurs in connection with a chapter gathering, investigators may examine whether the event involved university-recognized activities, what witnesses observed, and whether alcohol or other circumstances affected the encounter. The investigation may also consider group messages, photographs, transportation arrangements, or accounts from chapter members.

Membership in a Greek organization does not establish individual responsibility for misconduct. Similarly, attending a fraternity party or voluntarily consuming alcohol does not eliminate a person’s ability to report sexual assault. A student may face a sexual misconduct investigation even when a chapter is also subject to separate organizational review. Jeremy Saland assists respondents and complainants in addressing these allegations while considering their potential consequences for university enrollment, organizational participation, and personal relationships.

When Dating Violence or Stalking Allegations Involve Tulane Students

Sexual misconduct complaints can also develop from relationships that have ended or become contentious. Allegations may involve dating violence, domestic violence, stalking, threatening communications, repeated unwanted contact, or coercive behavior. Unlike cases centered on a single sexual encounter, these matters may require investigators to examine a prolonged pattern of interactions, including messages, social media activity, and encounters witnessed by mutual friends.

At Tulane, students who previously dated may continue to share classes, live in nearby residence halls, or participate in overlapping social organizations. A no-contact directive can create difficulties when both individuals regularly visit the same campus facilities or attend events involving shared acquaintances. Students should understand that the precise language of a university restriction matters and that attempts to communicate indirectly through friends or electronic platforms may create additional disciplinary concerns. Saland Law helps clients understand these directives, evaluate allegations of prohibited contact, and address requests for appropriate protective measures.

What Makes Tulane’s Title IX Hearing Procedures Different?

Tulane’s Office of Student Conduct publishes information explaining the distinction between ordinary student conduct hearings and proceedings involving allegations qualifying under the federal Title IX regulations. In certain student conduct matters, an investigator may play an important role in determining responsibility. Under Tulane’s federal Title IX grievance procedure, however, a separate decision-maker presides over a live hearing following the investigation. This structural difference can affect how evidence is presented, how witnesses are questioned, and how the parties prepare.

For covered Title IX hearings, Tulane permits cross-examination through the parties’ advisors. Each party must have an advisor to conduct the required questioning, and the university provides one when a student does not select an advisor. The decision-maker determines the relevance of proposed questions and may also question witnesses or the parties directly. Students themselves do not conduct cross-examination of the opposing party. These procedures make advisor selection and preparation particularly important when the case involves conflicting testimony or disputed consent.

Preparing Evidence and Questions for a Tulane Hearing

The hearing process is not simply an opportunity to repeat everything said during the investigation. Effective preparation requires a clear understanding of the investigative record, the issues genuinely in dispute, and the evidence supporting or contradicting particular allegations. Witness statements may contain inconsistencies, electronic messages may require contextual explanation, and certain proposed questions may be excluded because they are irrelevant or otherwise impermissible.

As a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor, Jeremy Saland brings experience examining disputed testimony and evaluating the significance of conflicting evidence. He assists clients with hearing preparation, identification of relevant factual questions, and strategies for presenting their positions within the university’s procedural requirements. For respondents, that may involve testing whether the evidence supports a finding of misconduct. For complainants, it may involve clarifying important testimony and addressing inconsistencies that could otherwise obscure the facts.

Representing Both Respondents and Complainants at Tulane

Saland Law recognizes that students participating in the same disciplinary process may have different concerns. Respondents may need assistance challenging allegations, presenting exculpatory evidence, and understanding the consequences of an adverse finding. Complainants may need help organizing evidence, preparing for questioning, and ensuring that the university appropriately considers their reported experiences and requests for support. Both parties have an interest in fair procedures, impartial decision-making, and accurate consideration of the evidence.

Our representation is tailored to the client’s position and the applicable university rules. We help respondents understand their procedural protections and prepare for potentially consequential interviews and hearings. We also advise complainants on their rights, available resources, and opportunities to participate in the grievance process. Regardless of which party we represent, our work emphasizes careful preparation, factual accuracy, and meaningful participation in the university’s proceedings. Whether pursuing an informal or administrative resolution is the right approach or presenting your side head on in a hearing is the right or only path forward, you will be ready and prepared to secure the best possible outcome.

Student-Athlete Title IX Cases and Tulane Green Wave Athletics

Tulane’s Green Wave athletic programs compete at the NCAA Division I level, with many teams participating in the American Conference. Football at Yulman Stadium, basketball and volleyball at Avron B. Fogelman Arena in the Devlin Fieldhouse, and baseball at Greer Field at Turchin Stadium are prominent parts of the university’s athletic community. Student-athletes also participate in programs involving tennis, swimming, track and field, and other sports, often balancing demanding training schedules with academic responsibilities.

When a Title IX allegation involves a student-athlete, disciplinary proceedings may create additional concerns about team participation, athletic travel, access to facilities, and relationships with coaches or teammates. A respondent may face interim restrictions before the university reaches a determination, while a complainant may need accommodations to continue participating in athletic activities without unwanted contact. Athletic department requirements may also exist separately from the procedures governing university disciplinary proceedings.

These overlapping responsibilities require individualized attention. An allegation does not itself establish that misconduct occurred, and restrictions should be evaluated under the applicable university rules. Saland Law assists students in understanding how supportive measures and disciplinary procedures may affect both their athletic commitments and their educational opportunities.

Tulane provides information about both formal disciplinary proceedings and informal or alternative resolution options. Depending on the nature of the allegations and applicable eligibility requirements, the parties may be offered an opportunity to resolve certain matters without completing a contested hearing. Any such process should be approached carefully because an agreement may establish obligations affecting communication, participation in activities, or other aspects of campus life. Students should understand the terms and consequences of an agreement before deciding whether informal resolution serves their interests. Keep in mind that any informal resolution, also sometimes called an administrative resolution, must be agreed upon by all parties including the university.

When a formal proceeding results in a responsibility determination, the applicable policy provides opportunities for appeal, albeit for only specified reasons. Permissible grounds can include certain procedural irregularities, newly discovered evidence, or conflicts of interest and bias affecting the outcome. Appeals are subject to procedural requirements and generally are not unrestricted opportunities to repeat the original hearing. Our firm helps clients evaluate whether the circumstances provide a legitimate basis for challenging a determination and, if so, works with the student to draft the most compelling arguments for submission.

Certain sexual misconduct allegations may also lead to investigations by the New Orleans Police Department or other law enforcement authorities. Sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking may implicate Louisiana criminal law depending on the facts. University proceedings and criminal investigations operate under different evidentiary standards and can produce very different consequences. Students facing both processes should separately consider obtaining legal advice addressing the potential implications of statements and evidence shared during either investigation.

Why Choose Jeremy Saland for a Tulane University Title IX Matter?

Jeremy Saland’s experience as a criminal defense lawyer and former prosecutor provides an invaluable perspective when a university disciplinary case involves disputed facts, witness credibility, collecting and presenting evidence, and potentially serious consequences. He understands the importance of thorough preparation, identifying evidentiary weaknesses, and developing questions that clarify conflicting testimony. These skills are particularly relevant in sexual misconduct proceedings where the parties may disagree about consent, prior communications, or the circumstances surrounding an alleged incident.

At Saland Law, we have successfully assisted and continue to represent both students accused of violating university policies and individuals reporting sexual misconduct. Our services include investigation preparation, evidence analysis, advisor participation, hearing strategy, and assistance with applicable appeals. Although headquartered in New York City, due to the virtual and online nature of Title IX proceedings, our firm advises students at universities nationwide, including Tulane University. We understand that university disciplinary procedures can be unfamiliar and intimidating, and we work to give clients the information and preparation needed to make informed decisions.

Contact a Tulane University Title IX Lawyer Advisor

A sexual misconduct allegation at Tulane University can affect academic progress, housing, friendships, athletic participation, and future professional opportunities. Whether the matter involves sexual assault, disputed affirmative consent, unwanted sexual contact, dating violence, stalking, or sexual harassment, the university’s procedures should be taken seriously from the beginning. Both complainants and respondents deserve to understand their rights and the potential consequences of participating in an investigation or disciplinary hearing.

Contact Saland Law to discuss your Tulane University Title IX matter with criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Jeremy Saland. Our firm provides individualized advisory services to students involved in university investigations and hearings, helping clients understand the applicable procedures, prepare their evidence, and protect their interests throughout the disciplinary process.

Client Reviews

Hey. Did you do something dumb? Do you have absolutely zero information about the legal process? Do you want an attorney that seemingly does this for sport and probably won’t sleep until your life is back? Well then I highly recommend the attorney equivalent of an alligator wrestler: Jeremy Saland...

Evan

Such as amazing lawyer to have to fight my case. My first time meeting Mr. Saland I was skeptical, coming from a previous lawyer who judged me from the beginning without even letting me tell my side of the story, assumed that I was guilty. I was nervous, but sitting down and talking to Saland about...

Omari Merritt

We Provide Nationwide Title IX Advocacy From Our New York Offices.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Consultation*
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 We Will Fight for You!

Fill out the contact form or call us at 212.312.7129 to schedule your free consultation*.

Leave Us a Message